WFT

Understanding the amount of accruals a company has on its books and the quality of its reported earnings is especially important during earnings season, as poor earnings quality companies are more likely to have negative earnings surprises and underperform as a result. With so many companies reporting earnings this week, we wanted to share an analysis of their earnings quality based on The Applied Finance Group’s Earnings Quality score. AFG’s Earnings Quality variable is based on the concept of accruals and is an important indicator, which helps to differentiate between companies with poor and high quality of reported earnings. Watch out for firms with poor EQ score – make sure they are not trying to pad their sales numbers through channel stuffing, for example.

*Source: www.afgview.com

Two ways to approach accruals:

1. Cash Flow Statement
•Difference between Net Income and Cash Flow

2. Balance Sheet
•Change in Net Operating Assets from Period t-1 to t
•Net Operating Asset equals Total Assets Less Cash, Less Non-Debt Liabilities (excl. Minority Interest)
• Our studies show that the Balance Sheet approach is superior to the Cash Flow Statement approach.
• We found the Balance Sheet approach is also easier to expand to international companies.
• Low Accrual companies outperform high accrual companies
 

 Here is a look at how well the Earnings Quality variable works when you split top half vs. bottom half in each sector/style universe.

Source: AFGView client databases from 9/1998 - 5/2009   Universe size: 4,000 to 5,500 firms

Here is a look at an example of a poor Earnings Quality company that has a negative earning surprise and thus underperforms.

Eastman Kodak

• Other Liabilities declined in Q308, leading to high accruals – change in licensing agreement required immediate recognition of deferred revenue.
• Eastman Kodak (EK) subsequently missed earnings in Q408.
• EK’s stock dropped 29% on January 28th, when Q408 earnings were announced.
• EK has underperformed the S&P500 by almost 70% since January 28th.
 

source: www.economicmargin.com

With a major week of earnings right around the corner, we thought it would be useful to our readers to provide an analysis of the companies set to report in the first half of next week. This analysis contains a breakdown of each company's default recommendation according to AFG's Buy/Sell criteria, a look at their valuation attractiveness, and a look at the direction their Economic Margin's are expected to head in the upcoming year. The three companies that look the most attractive based on these criteria are Pfizer, Advanced Micro Devices and Boston Scientific.

A company's Economic Margin (EM) is a measurement of a their true earnings above or below their cost of capital. EM also corrects distortions caused by accounting policies to give a more accurate assessment of a company's real value. It is important to understand the direction a company's EM's are heading because, by knowing this, one can get a complete assessment of how profitable a company can be in the future. The EM Framework addresses profitability, competition, growth and cost of capital. When factoring in each of these variables, investors can fully assess a company's value. 

Below is the list of companies reporting earnings in the first half of the upcoming week along with a closer look at Boston Scientific:

 According to the chart below, BSX's intrinsic value is above its current stock price, which leads us to believe that Boston Scientific is undervalued right now. 

 According to the Wealth Creation chart below, BSX has shown a positive Economic Margin and is forecasted to improve that margin in the upcoming year.

Source: Www.EconomicMargin.com 

AFG's Buy/Sell criteria factor in Economic Margin, Management Quality, and AFG's Valuation Metric. In order to determine Management Quality, AFG scores management on their growth decisions in accordance with the company’s ability to either create or destroy wealth. AFG's Valuation Metric measures a company's Percent to Target (the deviation between a stock's current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model.

AFG's default valuation is a good place to start because it is a simple metric that gives a more accurate outlook on a company's value while correcting distortions.

- - - - - - - - - - -

AFG’s Intrinsic Value Chart identifies how far a stock’s intrinsic value (target price assuming immediate decay) deviates from its trading range, which helps you recognize potentially mispriced stocks and pursue long and short opportunities.

• The blue bars represent the high and low trading range for a stock for 1 year.
• The red dotted line represents AFG’s historical Intrinsic Value through time.
• When the red line (Intrinsic Value) is above the blue bars (trading range), the company looks to be undervalued.
• When the red line (Intrinsic Value) is below the blue bars (trading range), the company looks to be overvalued.

AFG’s Intrinsic Value Chart also contains a company’s Value Score (ranked valuation attractiveness), Economic Margin Change (expected increase/decrease in economic profitability), and Accuracy score (how well AFG’s default valuation has tracked the company).

Wealth Creation Report: displays a company’s Economic Margins (what a company earns above or below its cost of capital) through time as well as a projection of their expected future levels. The second graph shows how a company has grown their assets over time and also contains a projection of how they will grow their assets next year. AFG’s view on wealth creation starts by looking for profitable companies that are also growing their assets to make the most of that profitability.

Investment Insights from your peers, Professional Investors - The Applied Finance Group would like to invite professional investors to join AFG’s Market Forecast Project so you can better understand what your peers currently think about the market and cultivate the “wisdom of Crowds” into actionable investment ideas and themes. 
Click here to learn more

There are many ways professional equity investors use to narrow their list of investment constituents; by size, value, growth, sales growth, earnings growth, etc. When ValueExpectations.com looks for investment opportunities or to avoid potential torpedoes, we start with a focus on accessing Valuation, Corporate Performance (Economic Margin), and Management Quality of companies. These variables have proven very successful in finding winners and avoiding losers in different market caps, different styles, and different economic sectors, helping professional investors make sound stock selections in the past 13 years. These and many other proprietary variables can be screened on Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) institutional product www.AFGView.com.

Enjoying an accomplished methodology and process of selecting stocks doesn’t prevent us from learning how other people are identifying their fishing pool. We recently came across SA Editor Eli Hoffman's recommended list of stocks based on a set of variables that , he believes benefit both growth and value investors as these companies contain characteristics both investors will find attractive. These stocks were identified by what the author calls “a powerful screen and helps find strong companies at great values”.

Eli Hoffman's screen includes the following criteria:

• Only companies identified as Buys by Zack’s
• Companies with the highest 5 year historical earnings growth rates (top 20% all Zack’s Buy Rec.)
• Lowest P/E ratio (bottom 20% all Zack’s Buy Rec.)
• Trading over $5 a share
• 10 day avg. share volume of 50,000 shares or more

As the AFG methodology has also proven effective in identifying attractive stocks regardless of their Growth or Value characteristics, we thought it would be interesting to check the valuation attractiveness of Mr Hoffman’s stocks via AFG’s Value Expectation application. AFG’s Value Expectation allows us to understand the imbedded Sales Growth, EBITDA Margins, and Asset Turnovers a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The following table displays the implied future sales growth of Mr Hoffman’s companies assuming their EBITDA margins and Asset turnovers stay at the 5 year median levels.

Companies recommended by Mr Hoffman appear to have pessimistic future sales growth implied by their current stock prices, when compared to their historical sales growth, and appear to be undervalued from AFG’s valuation perspective. Before making a wise investment decision, however, we also need to understand a company’s corporate performance (Economic Margin), management quality, competitive advantages and valuation attractiveness relative to its industry and sector peers. AFG’s institutional product helps investors to gain considerable insight regarding those aspects through its proprietary framework and we will provide a detailed tutorial of this process next week. 

Register to view our Special Studies and Market Reivews... its FAST and FREE!!

Fidelity’s Low Priced Stock Fund, which launched in 1989 (18 Billion AUM) and is managed by Joel Tillinghast, follows a simple strategy… Only invest in stocks with a share price under $35. This strategy first started with Tillinghast only investing in stocks below $10 a share, but later he moved the limit up to $35 a share. He argues that share price alone is not important but that the small-cap universe contains the most frequently mispriced stocks and the least amount of analyst coverage.

Although his fund at best has been a market performer as of late, Tillinghast had taken advantage of such mispricing’s during the last 15 years, averaging an 11% annual return compared to the 6% return earned by the S&P 500 over the same period. The fund had been closed to investors since 2003, but was recently reopened in December. Fidelity says they reopened the fund to get more cash inflow to be able to take advantage of all of the investment opportunities they see in the market.

Below is a list of the top holdings in Fidelity’s Low Priced Stock Fund as well as stocks that AFG believes are attractively priced in three price brackets: under $10, $10 to $20, and $20 to $35. Compare the implied sales growth priced-in to justify the current trading price (VE Sales Growth) vs. what the company has delivered in sales growth the past 5 years (5 Year Median Sales Growth) to see if the expectations are realistic for the company to achieve. The more realistic the expectations are, compared to what has been delivered, the more likely the firm will be to out-perform.

Nearly all of the biggest return earning companies in the S&P 500 are firms that have been beaten up over the past few months but have bounced back to provide the biggest return in the entire index for the month of December. These firms have ended 2008 on a high note and move into 2009 with what they hope to be sustainable momentum.

The list of companies in the S&P 500 with the worst returns in December had also been trending downward for the past few months but were unable to muster a year-end turnaround as those on the other list had been able accomplish. Many of the firms on this list have something to do with oil, as their stock prices have been highly correlated with the falling price of oil.

Compare the sales growth priced-in to justify the current stock price (VE Sales Growth), to what the company has been able to deliver the past 5 years in revenue growth (5 Year Median Sales Growth), to see which companies have reasonable expectations of achieving the Sales Growth priced-in. Companies with low expectations relative to what they have been able to achieve are more likely to out-perform.

Sales Growth Expectations for the Highest Return Companies (S&P 500) - December

**denotes only 2 years historical sales growth available (2 year median used)

Sales Growth Expectations for the Lowest Return Companies (S&P 500) - December

VE Sales Growth Calculated for these firms on 12/26/08.