MHP

When searching for Large-Cap ideas, The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) Buy/Sell lists are a good starting place for investors as it has proven to create a significant spread in performance between companies that come up on AFG’s buy list and those on the sell list. Focusing on companies based on AFG’s proprietary screening criteria (Economic Margin, valuation, quality of earnings, and management’s ability to create shareholder wealth) will save investors time in their research process. The result is a target group of stocks that can help you outperform. In the near future we will provide VE.com readers a list of unattractive stocks from each sector that will help our readers identify potential torpedoes to avoid in your portfolios. Below is a list of attractive companies in the S&P 500 (INDEXSP:.INX) from each major AFG sector (excluding financials). It serves as a focus list of companies for investors to begin with as they meet AFG’s criteria to be an attractive opportunity. They are more likely to outperform their sector peers and the S&P 500, the benchmark that AFG’s clients most often compare themselves with. Companies Include Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE:XOM) and Corning Inc. (NYSE:GLW).

ValueExpectations.com emphasizes evaluating a company’s ability to earn a spread above their cost of capital using a very robust measure of corporate performance, Economic Margin. After evaluating a firm’s ability to create wealth VE.com then determines what price we are paying for the company using a modified discounted cash flow model. If we had to simplify performance, a very elementary way to evaluate performance can be Return on Invested Capital ROIC and valuation which can be simplified by using earnings yield. This is the approach Joel Grenblatt uses in his book, The Little Blue Book that Beats the Market.

In January VE.com highlighted a list of stocks based on Joel Greenblatt’s Magic Formula Investing Strategy from 1998-2004 Greenblatt’s simulated returns were 30.8% a year, relative to a 12.4% annual return for the S&P 500 and was only down in one year in that time-span.

In our article posted on January 9, 2009 we listed our best 30 “Magic Formula” companies which has earned returns comparable to the tests conducted by Mr. Greenblatt. From Jan. 9, 2009 to Dec. 14, 2009 the 30 companies we recommended from our “Magic Screen” have returned a solid 32.06% spread above the S&P 500. Since our last “Magic Formula” portfolio was successful we have decided to run the screen again for a new list of companies to see just how consistent this strategy is.

To stay updated on companies AFG believes are attractive investment opportunities register for ValueExpectations.com It's Fast and Free!

A look at Greenblatt’s formula for successful “Magic Formula Investing”:

1. Establish a minimum market capitalization (usually greater than $50 million).

2. Exclude utility and financial stocks

3. Exclude foreign companies (American Depositary Receipts)

4. Determine company's earnings yield = EBIT / enterprise value.

5. Determine company's return on capital = EBIT / (Net fixed assets + working capital)

6. Rank all companies above chosen market capitalization by highest earnings yield and highest return on capital (ranked as percentages).

7. Invest in 20-30 highest ranked companies, accumulating 2-3 positions per month over a 12-month period.

8. Re-balance portfolio once per year, selling losers one week before the year-mark and winners one week after the year mark.

9. Continue over long-term (3-5 year) period.

Mr. Greenblatt was a student of both Ben Graham and Warren Buffet and tried to include valuable insights from each investor in his “Magic Formula.” His Magic Formula was a screen that percentile ranked two variables: Return on Invested Capital (quality) and Earnings Yield (valuation). The idea is simple, buy the best companies at the best price and then hold on to them for one year. The Little Blue Book recommends selecting the top 30 firms from the “Magic Formula.” That formula ranks each company by variable and then puts a 50% weight on each.

Ticker  Company Name Sector Market Cap ROIC Earn Yield (NYSE:PM) Philip Morris Intl Inc Consumer Non Durable $96,066 265% 26% (NYSE:LO) Lorillard Inc Consumer Non Durable $12,671 111% 13% (NYSE:RAI) Reynolds American Inc Consumer Non Durable $15,560 116% 14% (NYSE:NOV) National Oilwell Varco Capital Goods $18,530 38% 17% (NYSE:ABC) Amerisource Bergen Corp Health $7,198 82% 12% (NASDAQ:APOL)  Apollo Group Inc Cl A Miscellaneous $9,602 164% 12% (NYSE:GD)  General Dynamics Corp Capital Goods $27,261 69% 12% (NYSE:BF.B)  Brown-Forman Corp Cl B Consumer Non Durable $8,335 124% 18% (NYSE:TSS)  Total System Services Consumer Services $3,439 50% 16% (NYSE:DNB)  Dun & Bradstreet Corp Consumer Services $4,285 -395% 10% (NYSE:LLL) L-3 Communications Hldgs Capital Goods $9,873 55% 12% (NYSE:MCK)  Mckesson Corp Health $16,880 43% 12% (NYSE:PFE) Pfizer Inc Health $148,488 17% 11% (NYSE:MO)  Altria Group Inc Consumer Non Durable $40,753 1693% 20% (NASDAQ:CEPH) Cephalon Inc Health $4,414 32% 12% (NYSE:OMC)   Omnicom Group Inc Consumer Services $11,681 -178% 10% (NYSE:DO) Diamond Offshre Drilling Capital Goods $13,503 37% 14% (NYSE:LLY)  Eli Lilly & Co Health $40,928 47% 15% (NYSE:SNI) Scripps Networks Intr In Consumer Services $6,692 77% 10% (NASDAQ:BIIB) Biogen Idec Inc Health $14,133 46% 11% (NYSE:FRX)  Forest Laboratories Inc Health $9,563 22% 13% (NYSE:RTN)  Raytheon Co Capital Goods $20,479 67% 14% (NYSE:DPS) Dr Pepper Snapple Grp Consumer Non Durable $7,131 71% 10% (NYSE:HRS) Harris Corp Technology $5,964 57% 11% (NYSE:MHP) Mcgraw-Hill Co Inc Consumer Services $10,886 129% 11% (NYSE:FLR) Fluor Corp Capital Goods $7,252 46% 20% (NYSE:LH)  Laboratory Cp Am Hldgs Health $7,961 108% 10% (NYSE:LH)  Moody'S Corp Consumer Services $6,281 -2400% 9% (NYSE:FLS) Flowserve Corp Capital Goods $5,398 40% 11% (NYSE:GME) Gamestop Corp Cl A Consumer Services $3,671 69% 17%

 

 Click Here - If you are a professional investor and would like a review of your portfolio by an AFG representative or to discuss companies AFG find attractive that fit your investment style.

To stay updated on companies AFG believes are attractive investment opportunities register for ValueExpectations.com It's Fast and Free! 

Keeping an eye on the big movers in the market does not help investors determine which stocks are poised to continue their upward or downward movement. To help our devoted readers identify the movers that still look fundamentally sound and those to walk away from, ValueExpectations.com has scored each of the top 10 Hot and Cold stocks of the month based on Valuation Attractiveness and Economic Margin Change.

If an investor should consider adding any of these stocks as a holding for a portfolio, one should look for companies with attractive valuations and expected improvements in a company’s Economic Margin (EM) which essentially is a measure of a company’s true economic profitability. As an additional level of analysis, we also recommend understanding the embedded expectations that are priced into each of these stocks.

AFG’s Valuation techniques and understanding of economic profitability have proven to identify mispriced securities in the market and help clients take advantage of mispriced securities. Accurately assessing a company’s profitability and understanding how to answer key questions such as… What is the cash flow generated by the company’s operations? How much capital is required? What are the opportunity costs of this capital? This robust process is what sets AFG’s corporate performance metric Economic Margin (EM) apart from other Value Based Metrics such as an IRR calculation, a CFIRR or a RONA Economic Profit approach.

It is not surprising to see the list of best performers dominated by Tech stocks as professional investors in our last month’s sentiment poll identified Technology as the most attractive sector to bet on in the upcoming months and companies like DOW and EK on their respective best and worst lists as they both have been discussed recently on VE.com. Dow was recently noted as one of the most attractive stocks within AFG’s Basic Materials sector (ranked 2nd most attractive sector amongst professional investors) in mid-august. Eastman Kodak (EK) is just one example of a torpedo AFG’s clients and ValueExpectations.com readers have avoided due to regularly being on AFG lists of stocks to avoid and also a model of poor Earnings Quality (high accruals) one way AFG filters out companies likely to underperform, and more likely to encounter a negative earnings surprise. EK has consistently had a poor EQ score according to AFG’s measure of accruals and continues to be ranked amongst the worst in its sector in Earnings Quality.

Rank within Sector September Returns Ticker Name Sector Valuation Signal EM Change Signal S&P 500 Best Returns In September (ex. Financials)  (NYSE:DYN) DYNEGY INC A Energy and Extraction Attractive Positive 24.73% (NYSE:DOW)  DOW CHEMICAL CO THE Basic Material Attractive Positive 27.32% (NYSE:PCS) METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS Technology Attractive Negative 24.61% (NYSE:CNX) CONSOL ENERGY INC Energy and Extraction Unattractive Positive 24.43% (NYSE:ODP)  OFFICE DEPOT INC Consumer Services Unattractive Positive 25.46% (NYSE:THC) TENET HEALTHCARE CORP Health Unattractive Positive 25.97% (NASDAQ:SNDK) SANDISK CORP Technology Unattractive Positive 29.71% (NYSE:AMD) ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES Technology Unattractive Positive 34.12% (NASDAQ:CIEN) CIENA CORP Technology Unattractive Negative 28.40% (NASDAQ:WYNN) WYNN RESORTS LTD Consumer Services Unattractive Negative 32.62% S&P 500 Worst Returns In September (ex. Financials)  (NYSE:FDO)  FAMILY DOLLAR STORES INC Consumer Services Attractive Positive -13.57% (NYSE:BSX) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP Health Attractive Positive -5.51% (NYSE:MHP)  MCGRAW-HILL CO INC Consumer Services Attractive Negative -27.30% (NYSE:AEE)  AMEREN CORP Utilities Attractive Negative -6.11% (NYSE:MON)  MONSANTO CO Basic Material Fair Positive -6.16% (NYSE:KFT) KRAFT FOODS INC CL A Consumer Non Durable Fair Positive -6.02% (NYSE:DHI) D.R. HORTON INC Capital Goods Unattractive Positive -7.59% (NYSE:PHM)  PULTE HOMES Capital Goods Unattractive Positive -6.34% (NYSE:IRM)  IRON MOUNTAIN INC Consumer Services Unattractive Positive -6.27% (NYSE:EK)  EASTMAN KODAK CO Consumer Durable Unattractive Negative -11.74%

 

Traditional Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models have been been underutilized in equity analysis over the years primarily because of the assumptions one has to sign off on. We will concentrate on just two of the major issues we have with traditional DCF models, the lack of ability to deal with competition and the perpetuity assumption embedded in a DCF model. These assumptions lead to irrational calculations of intrinsic value and force analysts to make compromising decisions in their model building efforts.

AFG uses a modified DCF model that accurately addresses the competitive nature of the business while also dealing with the perpetuity issue through our Economic Margin decay or competitive advantage period.

The four factors that affect AFG’s Competitive Advantage Period (CAP) are;

Profitability – High Profit leads to increased competition and a higher decay rate
Variability – Higher volatility leads to less predictability and a higher decay rate
Trend – AFG gives the benefit of the doubt to an upward trend which leads to a lower decay rate
Invested Capital – Large Invested Capital creates barriers to entry and leads to lower decay rate

The Decay Rate is the rate at which the Economic Margins™ will diminish over time due to competition, market conditions and limited investment opportunities. Higher decay rates translate into shorter competitive advantage periods, while lower decay rates translate into longer competitive advantage periods.

The Decay Rate profile is downward sloping to the right, which means that Economic Margins™ over time diminish to zero. This does not mean that the company will not have earnings, but instead the company will have an Economic Margin™ of zero, which indicates there are no excess profits after the investors are paid and the depreciating assets are replaced.When selecting securities, companies that are maintaining a high level of economic profitability or growing their profits rapidly are attractive from an investment standpoint. However, the more profitable a firm is the more likely other companies will attempt compete away excess returns.

To illustrate this, one has to look no further than Dell Computer. Dell Computer had Economic Margins™ hovering around 40% (top 5% of all companies) in 1997 and 1998, but soon every major firm was announcing that they were going to build computers to order. Why? Because they saw the huge profits that Dell was making. The result is that Dell's Economic Margin™ for 1999 was around 25%, a decline of 37.5% in just one year. The remaining factors are relatively straight-forward, in that volatile returns are worth less than consistent returns, companies with an increasing Economic Margins™ are worth more than a company in decline, and large companies have a natural barrier to entry, thus a lower decay rate.

 

Theory: Excess return gets competed away

Fact: In 1997, the median top decile Economic Margin (EM) firm = 17.4%. 10 years later, that same group of companies had a median EM of 6.5%. On the other hand, the bottom decile had an EM of -12.2%, 10 years later that same group had a median EM of -1.0%.

 

Current Top Decile Economic Margin Companies (S&P 500 ex. financials)

 

Join Value Expectations... it's FAST and FREE!

In Joel Greenblatt’s 2006 book, The Little Blue Book that Beats the Market, he presented his “Magic Formula” used in his hedge fund, Gotham Capital. Mr Greenblatt tested his formula between 1988 and 2004. The results were incredible, with only one down year, the magic portfolio would have returned 30.8% a year, against a 12.4% annual return for the S&P 500.

Mr. Greenblatt was a student of both Ben Graham and Warren Buffet and tried to include valuable insights from each investor in his “Magic Formula.” His Magic Formula was a screen that percentile ranked two variables: Return on Invested Capital (quality) and Earnings Yield (valuation). The idea is simple, buy the best companies at the best price. He also recommends one year holding periods, so we thought this would be a great time to get this list out. The Little Blue Book recommends selecting the top 30 firms from the “Magic Formula.” That formula ranks each company by variable and then puts a 50% weight on each. Below is a definition of each variable.

Variable 1: Return on Invested Capital = EBIT / (Net Working Capital + Net Fixed assets)

Variable 2: Earnings Yield = EBIT/EV

The table below shows the top 30 firms with their market implied sales growth expectations. Enjoy!

 

For the past 26 years Steven Halpern, editor of thestockadvisors.com has gone to well known and respected advisors once a year to find out which stocks they like for the coming year. Take a look at the list of stocks advisors liked in 2008 and their performance. Also listed are the picks of 75 prominent advisors for 2009 along with sales growth expectations for the companies to justify their current price (VE Sales Growth) which can be compared to what they have delivered in revenue growth over the past 5 years(5 Year Median Sales Growth). These companies are worth a look because they are in favor of well-respected advisors, but the companies that also have low expectations for sales growth priced-in to their stock are especially worthy of a close review.

 

2008 Blogger Picks Conservative and 2008 Performance

 

2008 Blogger Picks Speculative and 2008 Performance

 

Blogger Picks for 2009 and Sales Expectations

* denotes # of years historical sales numbers available

VE Sales Growth calculated for these firms on 1-6-09