LVLT

Last week on www.ValueExpectations.com we provided readers a list of the most reliable companies from the Russell 1000 based on the quality of earnings (accrual levels), management’s ability to create wealth along with other criteria The Applied Finance Group uses in its stock research process to identify firms that are the most likely to outperform. After the large selloff yesterday, with many predicting another large correction around the corner and the increasing number of bearish opinions on the market we will provide our readers a list of the riskiest firms in the Russell 1000 to avoid or to trim from your portfolio when looking to eliminate positions.

Recently, Moody’s released a list of what they call “Bottom Rung Companies” which is based on the company’s ability, or lack thereof, to pay back the debt it owes. The 283 companies on the list roughly represent the riskiest 15% of all firms that Moody’s tracks. Moody’s does not always designate the most appropriate ratings (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were rated AAA before defaulting), so we decided to take their list into our own hands and provide the true bottom rung companies.

With so much negative news going around and many companies declaring bankruptcy, it is no surprise that measures of a firm’s financial strength, such as the Altman Z-Score (likelihood of a company to go bankrupt in the next 2 years), have been re-gaining popularity in the current market environment. So to help with our analysis, we used the Z-Score metric to analyze the companies on Moody’s list, as well as The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) screening variables to determine how attractive these firm’s are from a valuation standpoint, and how each company’s forecasted profitability for their fiscal 2009 year looks (Forecasted Economic Margin). As a result, ValueExpectations.com has put together a list of the 17 “riskiest” companies to avoid. Each of these companies have “at risk” level Z-Scores, unattractive valuations, and are forecasted to achieve negative profitability (EM) for their 2009 fiscal year, all of which indicate that they will be more likely to underperform.

Below the table is a short description of the Altman Z-score and a breakdown of what the scores mean, along with a brief description of what Economic Margin (EM) is and how it is calculated.

 17 Companies At Risk of Bankruptcy

 The Altman Z-score defined: A metric that gives insights into the likelihood of a firm going bankrupt in the next 2 years. The model was developed by Professor Edward I. Altman of the NYU’s Stern School of Business and first published in The Journal of FINANCE in September 1968.

The Altman Z-Score breaks down firms into 3 zones:

• >2.99 – Not Likely to go Bankrupt

• 1.8 - 2.99 – Gray Area

• <1.8 – Likely to go Bankrupt in the Next 2 Years

Economic Margin (EM) Defined: A measure of corporate performance that captures off balance sheet items, by looking at how much a company is earning above or below their cost of capital. EM is expressed in a % or margin. The Economic Margin Framework™ is more than just a performance metric as it encompasses a valuation system that explicitly addresses the four main drivers of enterprise value: profitability, competition, growth and cost of capital. more EM details (PDF)

 Economic Margin Calculation:

Related Article: EPS Increased.....Company Underperformed?

Related: Read our Economic Margin white paper which was published in the book: Value-Based Metrics: Foundations and Practice Edited by: Frank J. Fabozzi and James L. Grant Pages 157 – 178: Click Here

On January 13th, 2009, we posted a list of companies that were, “In Shape and Looking Good.” The screen looked at the Altman Z-Score (a bankruptcy forecast model) and valuation. On January 14th, Nortel Networks (NT), filed for bankruptcy protection. As of January 13, 2009, Nortel had a Z-Score of -3.5. As we posted earlier this week, Dr. Altman’s heuristic is broken down into 3 zones:

The Altman Z-Score breaks down firms into 3 zones:

• >2.99 – Not Likely to go Bankrupt
• 1.8 - 2.99 – Gray Area
• <1.8 – Likely to go Bankrupt in the Next 2 Years

As you can see from the chart below, Nortel Networks (NT) has a Z-score of -3.5 putting it in the “Likely to go Bankrupt in the Next 2 Year” category. Looking at its peers, ALU looks in jeopardy, where CSCO and JNPR are safe in the “Not Likely to go Bankrupt in the Next 2 Years” zone.

Below is a List of Firms in the R1000, that have negative Z-scores like Nortel Networks (NT) as of January 13th, 2009. Besides Z-Score this table also provides implied sales growth expectations priced-ion to justify their current price. Those with an N/A for VE Sales Growth need to fix their business model before we begin to evaluate the embedded expectations in their stock's price.

*VE Sales Growth calculated for these firms on 1-13-09