FDO

A list of the 25 top performing stocks of 2010 (ex. Financials) from within the S&P 500 index. We have taken the top 25 companies from 2010 and provided our readers 3 attractive and 5 unattractive stocks from this list based on their valuation attractiveness relative to sector peers and overall investment opportunity using key criteria that The Applied Finance Group (AFG) uses in its stock selection process including corporate performance, management quality and earnings quality to see which of the top performers still look to have upside and which look like they have run out of room to run.

With the biggest shopping season of the year just around the corner, we thought it would be timely to highlight some consumer sector companies that look attractive according to The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) criteria for investment opportunity attractiveness, as they are in line to benefit from the upcoming seasonal spending patterns. The list of companies we have provided look the most attractive within the AFG consumer sector in terms of valuation attractiveness, economic performance, and overall investment attractiveness relative to their peers.

One of the companies that we feel particularly confident in is the retailer Kohl’s (KSS) which is currently a holding in The AFG 50, (a model portfolio of 50 large cap stocks designed to help Portfolio Managers save time, make more informed investment decisions, and outperform their benchmark). We are confident about Kohl’s competitiveness because they have a strong cash flow, strong execution, and have been outperforming their competition.

Going into this holiday season, consumers will most likely remain thrifty due to the overriding economic conditions, although their confidence levels have improved so far this year. They will search hard for values, being mindful of budget. We continue to believe Kohl’s will remain one of the most successful retailers in this country, as it strives to and succeeds in providing value to consumers with freshness and relevance of its merchandize.

The complete list of consumer stocks we have provided below, which includes the highlighted Kohl’s, are the companies AFG believes are the most likely to outperform. Companies that AFG identifies as having an attractive valuation, improving Economic Margins (AFG’s corporate performance metric) and an attractive investment opportunity signal have proven over time to outperform those companies with unattractive valuations, declining Economic Margins, and unattractive investment opportunity signal.

AFG Ticker Name AFG Sector Investment Opportunity 12 Attractive Consumer Companies (S&P 500) (NYSE:ARO) AEROPOSTALE INC Consumer Services Attractive (NASDAQ:ROST) ROSS STORES INC Consumer Services Attractive (NYSE:TJX) TJX COMPANIES INC THE Consumer Services Attractive (NASDAQ:DLTR) DOLLAR TREE INC Consumer Services Attractive (NYSE:KSS) KOHL'S CORP Consumer Services Attractive (NYSE:FDO) FAMILY DOLLAR STORES INC Consumer Services Attractive (NYSE:BIG) BIG LOTS INC Consumer Services Attractive (NYSE:GPS) GAP INC THE Consumer Services Attractive (NYSE:GME)  GAMESTOP CORP CL A Consumer Services Attractive (NYSE:WMT)  WAL-MART STORES INC Consumer Services Attractive (NYSE:BBY)  BEST BUY CO INC Consumer Services Attractive (NYSE:COH) COACH INC Consumer Non Durable Attractive

Source: EconomicMargin.com

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Management Quality – Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.

 

To stay updated on how other professional investor's currently view the market join our Market Forecast Project survey and be among the first to receive the results.

Keeping an eye on the big movers in the market does not help investors determine which stocks are poised to continue their upward or downward movement. To help our devoted readers identify the movers that still look fundamentally sound and those to walk away from, ValueExpectations.com has scored each of the top 10 Hot and Cold stocks of the month based on Valuation Attractiveness and Economic Margin Change.

If an investor should consider adding any of these stocks as a holding for a portfolio, one should look for companies with attractive valuations and expected improvements in a company’s Economic Margin (EM) which essentially is a measure of a company’s true economic profitability. As an additional level of analysis, we also recommend understanding the embedded expectations that are priced into each of these stocks.

AFG’s Valuation techniques and understanding of economic profitability have proven to identify mispriced securities in the market and help clients take advantage of mispriced securities. Accurately assessing a company’s profitability and understanding how to answer key questions such as… What is the cash flow generated by the company’s operations? How much capital is required? What are the opportunity costs of this capital? This robust process is what sets AFG’s corporate performance metric Economic Margin (EM) apart from other Value Based Metrics such as an IRR calculation, a CFIRR or a RONA Economic Profit approach.

It is not surprising to see the list of best performers dominated by Tech stocks as professional investors in our last month’s sentiment poll identified Technology as the most attractive sector to bet on in the upcoming months and companies like DOW and EK on their respective best and worst lists as they both have been discussed recently on VE.com. Dow was recently noted as one of the most attractive stocks within AFG’s Basic Materials sector (ranked 2nd most attractive sector amongst professional investors) in mid-august. Eastman Kodak (EK) is just one example of a torpedo AFG’s clients and ValueExpectations.com readers have avoided due to regularly being on AFG lists of stocks to avoid and also a model of poor Earnings Quality (high accruals) one way AFG filters out companies likely to underperform, and more likely to encounter a negative earnings surprise. EK has consistently had a poor EQ score according to AFG’s measure of accruals and continues to be ranked amongst the worst in its sector in Earnings Quality.

Rank within Sector September Returns Ticker Name Sector Valuation Signal EM Change Signal S&P 500 Best Returns In September (ex. Financials)  (NYSE:DYN) DYNEGY INC A Energy and Extraction Attractive Positive 24.73% (NYSE:DOW)  DOW CHEMICAL CO THE Basic Material Attractive Positive 27.32% (NYSE:PCS) METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS Technology Attractive Negative 24.61% (NYSE:CNX) CONSOL ENERGY INC Energy and Extraction Unattractive Positive 24.43% (NYSE:ODP)  OFFICE DEPOT INC Consumer Services Unattractive Positive 25.46% (NYSE:THC) TENET HEALTHCARE CORP Health Unattractive Positive 25.97% (NASDAQ:SNDK) SANDISK CORP Technology Unattractive Positive 29.71% (NYSE:AMD) ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES Technology Unattractive Positive 34.12% (NASDAQ:CIEN) CIENA CORP Technology Unattractive Negative 28.40% (NASDAQ:WYNN) WYNN RESORTS LTD Consumer Services Unattractive Negative 32.62% S&P 500 Worst Returns In September (ex. Financials)  (NYSE:FDO)  FAMILY DOLLAR STORES INC Consumer Services Attractive Positive -13.57% (NYSE:BSX) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP Health Attractive Positive -5.51% (NYSE:MHP)  MCGRAW-HILL CO INC Consumer Services Attractive Negative -27.30% (NYSE:AEE)  AMEREN CORP Utilities Attractive Negative -6.11% (NYSE:MON)  MONSANTO CO Basic Material Fair Positive -6.16% (NYSE:KFT) KRAFT FOODS INC CL A Consumer Non Durable Fair Positive -6.02% (NYSE:DHI) D.R. HORTON INC Capital Goods Unattractive Positive -7.59% (NYSE:PHM)  PULTE HOMES Capital Goods Unattractive Positive -6.34% (NYSE:IRM)  IRON MOUNTAIN INC Consumer Services Unattractive Positive -6.27% (NYSE:EK)  EASTMAN KODAK CO Consumer Durable Unattractive Negative -11.74%

 

On March 9th 2009, the S&P 500 hit its low mark of the year of 666.79. Since March the market has rallied up to 1,068.78 as of the close on September 16, 2009 and we thought it timely to analyze the companies that have made the biggest gains and losses since the low and provide some insights on how we view the 10 biggest gainers and losers in the index going forward. All of the biggest movers have been ranked based on attractiveness according to The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) investment criteria and valuation model. The companies with the most attractive valuations and positive Economic Margin (AFG’s measure of corporate performance) movement have proven to be more likely to outperform those companies that look unattractive according to AFG investment criteria and that look expensive within AFG’s valuation model.

The list below contains the companies that have experienced the biggest price movements in the S&P 500 since the March 9th low and how each of these companies measure up going forward, according to AFG’s investment criteria and valuation model. Companies that look attractive according to AFG’s valuation model along with improving Economic Margins have proven through vigorous back-tests to identify the company’s most likely to outperform their benchmark.

AFG Investment Opportunity Rank within Sector % Move Since March 9th Low Ticker Name Sector Valuation Signal EM Change Signal S&P 500 Biggest Gainers Since March 9th Low (ex. Financials) (NYSE:TXT)  TEXTRON INC Capital Goods Unattractive Unattractive Negative 416% (NASDAQ:WYNN)  WYNN RESORTS LTD Consumer Services Unattractive Unattractive Negative 366% (NYSE:GCI) GANNETT CO INC Consumer Services Unattractive Unattractive Negative 365% (NYSE:ODP) OFFICE DEPOT INC Consumer Services Fair Unattractive Positive 969% (NYSE:GT)  GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER Consumer Durable Fair Unattractive Positive 342% (NYSE:F) FORD MOTOR CO Consumer Durable Fair Unattractive Positive 314% (NYSE:THC)  TENET HEALTHCARE CORP Health Fair Unattractive Fair 538% (NYSE:IP) INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO Basic Material Fair Unattractive Fair 467% (NYSE:WYN) WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORP Consumer Services Fair Fair Negative 422% (NYSE:DOW) DOW CHEMICAL CO THE Basic Material Fair Attractive Positive 308% S&P 500 Biggest Losers Since March 9th Low (ex. Financials) (NYSE:FDO)  FAMILY DOLLAR STORES INC Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive -12% (NASDAQ:CEPH) CEPHALON INC Health Attractive Attractive Positive -6% (NYSE:ABT) ABBOTT LABORATORIES Health Attractive Attractive Positive 1% (NYSE:DF) DEAN FOODS Consumer Non Durable Fair Attractive Positive -5% (NYSE:AZO)  AUTOZONE INC Consumer Services Fair Attractive Positive -2% (NYSE:PCS) METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS Technology Fair Attractive Fair -34% (NYSE:CAH) CARDINAL HEALTH INC Health Fair Attractive Negative -8% (NYSE:SUN)  SUNOCO INC Energy and Extraction Fair Attractive Negative 1% (NYSE:HES)  HESS CORP Energy and Extraction Fair Attractive Negative 1% (NYSE:HRB)  H&R BLOCK INC Consumer Services Fair Fair Positive -2%

 

Other Popular Articles: 

S&P 500 Expectations and Market Analysis 

Odds of a double dip of the economy

What Drives Market Prices? The Valuation vs. Momentum Dichotomy

The Consumer Confidence Index jumped higher in August than was expected and is at its highest point since the current recession began. The Consumer Confidence Index rose to 51.4 which beat expectations yet is still way below 90, the minimum level to indicate a healthy economy, but the confidence level is headed in the right direction. Being that consumers seem to be gaining confidence in an economic recovery, some consumer stocks may be returning to the forefront of some investor’s minds so we decided to put together a list of attractive consumer companies from the S&P 500.

All of the companies listed have an attractive valuation and are expected to improve their Economic Margins at a greater rate than their sector peers. All of these companies are also rated as attractive according to AFG’s default investment criteria which factors in valuation, economic performance and management quality.

Exchange/Ticker     AFG Rank within Sector Name Sector Investment Opportunity Valuation Signal EM Change Signal Attractive Consumer Services Companies - S&P 500 (NYSE: DRI) DARDEN RESTAURANTS Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: KR) KROGER CO THE Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: TJX) TJX COMPANIES INC THE Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: MCD) MCDONALD'S CORP Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: YUM) YUM! BRANDS INC Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: CVS) CVS CAREMARK CORP Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: FDO) FAMILY DOLLAR STORES INC Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: BIG) BIG LOTS INC Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive (NYSE: RSH) RADIOSHACK CORP Consumer Services Attractive Fair Positive (NYSE: WMT) WAL-MART STORES INC Consumer Services Attractive Attractive Positive

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Management Quality – Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.

 

After reading a few articles highlighting attractive retail/apparel stocks, we have decided to analyze the companies mentioned in these two articles based on their attractiveness from a valuation standpoint using AFG’s valuation model.  We have examined the expectations for sales growth embedded in their current prices using AFG’s Value Expectation interface, as well as provided four companies that we find attractive in this retail/apparel space. The first four companies listed in the table are from an article in MSN Money by Catherine Holahan that mentions companies thriving in the recession (performed well in March), The second four are from an article from The Curious Investor (SeekingAlpha.com) that give the author's picks for companies ready to take advantage of a retail revival when consumer spending returns to a more normal level. The final four stocks are companies that we find the most attractive in the retail/apparel space.

When analyzing the sales expectations for these companies, measuring the spread between a company’s VE sales growth expectations and what it has historically delivered will give you a good idea of which companies have the best chance of meeting or exceeding those expectations, and thus are more likely to outperform.

 Retail/Apparel Companies

 

*AFG’s Value Expectation allows us to understand the imbedded Sales Growth, EBITDA Margins, and Asset Turnovers a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The table displays the implied future sales growth of companies assuming their EBITDA margins and Asset turnovers stay at the 5 year median levels.

With the first quarter of 2009 winding down, ValueExpectations.com has compiled a list of the best and worst performing stocks thus far in 2009 (excluding financials). It is not surprising for us to see two companies on the top performer list (S and MYL) that also appeared on our list at the end of January, or three bottom performing companies (ODP, TXT and MTW) still remaining on the bottom performer list over a month and a half later. We published an article in early February highlighting the top and bottom performers for the month of January and posed the question “Is the January Effect effective?”

 

Top 10 S&P 500 Companies (YTD 2009)

 

Bottom 10 S&P 500 Companies (YTD 2009)

 

Our conclusion: Looking at the YTD returns for the companies in our January effect article's top and bottom lists, we notice that there is a huge spread. January’s top performers have earned an average return of 4.66% YTD compared to January’s bottom performers’ average YTD return of -57.15%. This pretty compelling spread suggests that the January effect may be something investors want to pay closer attention to next year and it may even be helpful for the remainder of 2009.

 

 

*AFG’s Value Expectation allows us to understand the imbedded Sales Growth, EBITDA Margins, and Asset Turnover a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The table displays the implied future sales growth of companies assuming their EBITDA margins and Asset turnover stay constant at the company's historical 5 year median.

As a new administration takes office, investors will be looking for companies that will benefit most from Obama taking office. Which stocks will your “Obama Portfolio” consist of? Will you load up on infrastructure, health-care, alternative-energy, or green companies? If Obama’s big plans are carried out, these are a few areas that may see a direct benefit. Karim Bardeesy from The Big Money put together a list of stocks they feel will benefit from the new administration and are comparing their “Obama Portfolio” to one created by Jim Cramer. Here we will look at both portfolios and compare their sales growth expectations to see which of these firms will be more likely to out-perform. We will re-visit at a later date to see which “Obama Portfolio” will have provided the better return.

 

 The Big Money's "Obama Portfolio" and Each Company's Sales Expectations

*denotes less than 5 years historical sales numbers, ** = 2 years *** = 3 years

 

Jim Cramer's "Obama Portfolio" and Each Company's Sales Expectations

 

VE Sales Growth calculated for these companies on 1-21-09

According to Forbes.com, Cramer and a few other financial blog-sites the following qualities are usually found in stocks that do well in economic downturns of extended time periods.

• Consumer necessities
• Ability to pay a dividend
• Ability to add employees as other firms cut back
• Productivity increases as market goes down
• Healthcare stocks
• Legacy Companies – high quality company with long business history
• Involved in Military
• Oil industry
• Infrastructure
• Companies that sell used goods
• Generic products
• Overseas exposure

The following companies all have one or more of the above qualities to help them survive and perform well in an economic downturn. This table provides the implied 5 year sales growth priced-in to the stock to justify its current price along with the 5 year median achieved sales growth. Compare the revenue growth priced-in to what the company has been able to deliver in the past 5 years to see if the expectations are reasonable enough for the company to meet. Companies with reasonable expectations compared to what they have achieved are the most likely companies on the list to out-perform.

Stocks with Recession Resistant Qualities & Sales Growth Expectations

 

 

These 20 companies produced the greatest returns in 2008 within the S&P 500. Let’s take a look at what is priced-in for sales growth going forward to justify their current price. Compare what expectations are priced-in (VE Sales growth) to what the company has been able to deliver the past five years (5 Year Median Sales Growth) to see if each company has realistic expectations. The more realistic the expectations are, the more likely the company will be on this list next year.

Top 20 Return S&P 500 Companies and Their VE Sales Growth

VE Sales Growth was calculated for these companies on 12/16/08