Stay Connected With VE
Popular content
Today's:
- 25 Best Stocks of 2010, Our take on 2010’s hot stocks – Including Big Lots Inc.(NYSE:BIG), Family Dollar Stores Inc. (NYSE:FDO)
- Don't Curb Short-Selling - The SEC resides in an unreal world.
- AFG Basic Valuation Concepts
- Kraft Foods Inc (NYSE:KFT) acquisition analysis of Cadbury Plc (NYSE:CBY)
- High Economic Margin Buys and Sells
Last viewed:
Recent Articles
Investment Advisor
Editor Recommended
F
25 Best Stocks of 2010, Our take on 2010’s hot stocks – Including Big Lots Inc.(NYSE:BIG), Family Dollar Stores Inc. (NYSE:FDO)
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Best Stocks Since Obama’s Election – Including Freeport-McMoran C & G (NYSE:FCX) Cognizant Tech (NASDAQ:CTSH)
With 2009 winding down and a full year in the books for the current administration, we have provided a breakdown of the best performing stocks since President Obama was sworn in as President on November 4, 2008.
|
Click Here to view some of the latest articles from ValueExpectations that we recommend reading!
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Top S&P 500 YTD Returns – Which Companies/Sectors Have Performed Best So Far - Including Nordstrom Inc. (NYSE:JWN)
With 3 Quarters of 2009 now in the books, we thought it would be timely to provide a list of the top 20 performers in the S&P 500 so far this year to give investors an idea of which stocks have been doing well. Along with the list of top 20 performing companies, we have also provided a breakdown of the average return by sector as defined by AFG vs. the entire S&P 500 index to show which sectors have been leading the way. Also by using The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG's) research and valuation model we have provided further analysis on 4 of the top performing companies, 2 that we find attractive going forward and 2 that we find unattractive, based on valuation attractiveness, expected improvement in economic profitability and the overall investment attractiveness, which is based on various criteria AFG uses when identifying long/short opportunities.
Top 20 Performers In S&P 500 YTD (Total Return)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 YTD Sector performance (average return %) in S&P 500
Here are a few companies from the list of top 2009 returns and we view these companies going forward based on valuation, Economic Margin Improvement, and other criteria AFG uses to value securities.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Popular Articles:
To stay updated on how other professional investor's currently view the market join our Market Forecast Project survey and be among the first to receive the results.
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
S&P 500 Biggest Movers Since March 9th Bottom (ex. Financials) – Including Family Dollar Stores (FDO) Textron (TXT)
On March 9th 2009, the S&P 500 hit its low mark of the year of 666.79. Since March the market has rallied up to 1,068.78 as of the close on September 16, 2009 and we thought it timely to analyze the companies that have made the biggest gains and losses since the low and provide some insights on how we view the 10 biggest gainers and losers in the index going forward. All of the biggest movers have been ranked based on attractiveness according to The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) investment criteria and valuation model. The companies with the most attractive valuations and positive Economic Margin (AFG’s measure of corporate performance) movement have proven to be more likely to outperform those companies that look unattractive according to AFG investment criteria and that look expensive within AFG’s valuation model.
The list below contains the companies that have experienced the biggest price movements in the S&P 500 since the March 9th low and how each of these companies measure up going forward, according to AFG’s investment criteria and valuation model. Companies that look attractive according to AFG’s valuation model along with improving Economic Margins have proven through vigorous back-tests to identify the company’s most likely to outperform their benchmark.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Popular Articles:
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
S&P 500 Top 10 Returns 2009 YTD
Now that we are more than halfway through 2009, It is an excellent time to highlight the top performers in the S&P 500 year-to-date and see which companies look the most attractive according to The Applied Finance Group (AFG). AFG’s valuation techniques have proven successful since 1996 at identifying mispriced securities and helping their clients take advantage of those market inefficiencies. Beyond valuation AFG helps clients understand the true economic profitability a company earns by using their Economic Margin methodology.
Economic Margin (EM) corrects distortions caused by traditional accounting policies to give a more accurate assessment of a company's true profitability. It is important to understand the direction a company's EM's are heading because companies expected to improve their Economic Margins have proven to be more likely to outperform than those with EM’s expected to deteriorate. The EM Framework addresses profitability, competition, growth and cost of capital. When factoring in each of these variables, investors can fully assess a company's value.
AFG's Buy/Sell criteria factors in Economic Margin, Management Quality, and AFG's Valuation Metric. In order to determine Management Quality, AFG scores management on their growth decisions in accordance with the company’s ability to either create or destroy wealth. AFG's Valuation Metric measures a company's Percent to Target (the deviation between a stock's current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model.
AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).
Risky Z-Score Companies that also Look Expensive
ValueExpectations.com has continued to provide investment ideas to help our readers make better informed investment decisions. In addition to finding Buy opportunities, VE.com also understands the importance of avoiding potential torpedoes given the current market volatility, so we have decided to provide a list of potential sell/short ideas from the S&P500 index (excluding Financials). These companies on our list look “At-Risk” of going bankrupt in the next 2 years according to the Altman Z-score (Z-Score), and look overvalued according to the AFG’s valuation framework.
Here is the list of 15 firms that you may want to avoid for your portfolio.
Overvalued S&P 500 Companies (Ex. Financials) with Poor Z-Scores (Altman Z-Score)
AFG Sell Criteria: When identifying possible sell/short opportunities (torpedoes) The Applied Finance Group (AFG) starts by running a screen using its proprietary Sell Criteria variables starting with Economic Margin. Economic Margin is a measure of corporate performance that identifies how profitable a company is by measuring how much the company earns above or below its cost of capital. In addition to corporate performance, AFG looks to identify those companies that are unattractively priced using our valuation model. Lastly AFG evaluates how well companies run their business using its Management Quality score, identifying companies that have management teams that destroy wealth.
The Altman Z-score - Z-score is a metric that gives insights into the likelihood of a firm going bankrupt in the next 2 years. The model was developed by Professor Edward I. Altman of the NYU’s Stern School of Business and first published in The Journal of FINANCE in September 1968. A common critique to this metric is that it was developed over 40 years ago and is no longer relevant.
In 2001, Professor Joseph D. Piotroski of The University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, published a paper called, Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski showed that value investors were rewarded by looking at a firm’s financial health and he showed that Z-score was a meaningful statistic.
More recently, on December 5, 2008, Dr. Altman was called to testify before a House of Representatives Committee on the condition of U.S. Automakers. In his testimony, he noted that Bloomberg, Inc. reported, “that approximately 1,000 users of their system per day access the Altman Z-Score model.”
The Altman Z-Score breaks down firms into 3 zones:
• >2.99 – Not Likely to Go Bankrupt
• 1.8 - 2.99 – Gray Area
• <1.8 – Likely to Go Bankrupt in the Next 2 Years
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
S&P 500 - YTD Returns by Sector
Below is a chart and table outlining the 2009 year to date performance of the sectors within the S&P 500. The Technology sector has lead the way thus-far and the Financial and Utility sectors have been dragging down the overall index performance coming up on the halfway point of 2009. Along with sector performance we have also provided a table with the best and worst 10 performing stocks within the S&P 500 index so far this year.
It is nice to see that 2 of the top 10 performers in the S&P 500 index (S, FCX) are stocks that we have recommended on multiple occasions on ValueExpectations.com. VE.com recommended Sprint on 11/26/08 AFG Buys, 12/29/08 High Value Score, 3/13/09 10 Most Undervalued and Freeport Mc-Moran on 1/17/09 4 Stocks To Consider, 1/30/09 5 Cheap Stocks, 2/17/09 Digging Deep.
Average Sector Returns (S&P 500 YTD)
Average Sector Returns (S&P 500 YTD)
Best and Worst 10 Performing Companies YTD 2009 (S&P 500)
The Applied Finance Group
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Obama's First 100 Days
As the first 100 days of the new administration have come and gone, portfolio managers and analysts are searching through the market to see which stocks, industries, and sectors will gain from new policy and which ones are potential torpedoes in their portfolio. In AFG’s Monthly Market Review we have highlighted some of the focus of the new administration and how it can affect decisions as an investor, and we continue to search through the market in the hope of identifying which companies warrant their performance and which ones look to be unattractive from a valuation standpoint. The companies within the Financial sector have moved for reasons other than valuation, and will not be evaluated from a valuation perspective but it is interesting to see which companies have done the best and worst given the recent market shift.
Below is a comparison of the performance of the market with the last four presidents - we understand that each president walked into a different economic environment, but it is interesting to see how each one faired their first 100 days. The key will be how the market does over the long haul, especially given the significant policy changes and challenges the markets face over the course of the next year.
S&P 500 Reactions to Obama's First 100 Days
Event Key Of Obama's First 100 Days
How Obama's First 100 Days Compare to Last 3 U.S. President's (S&P 500)
S&P 500 Companies With Best/Worst Returns During Obama's First 100 Days
Valuation Attractiveness of Top/Bottom 10 Companies in Obama's First 100 Days (Ex. Financials)
Valuation Model – Using AFG’s modified discounted cash flow model to measure the intrinsic value of a firm compared to its peers. AFG's Value Score - A score which represents the ranked percent to target (deviation between stock’s current trading price and AFG’s current default target price) or attractiveness (upside) relative to the universe. A Value Score of 100 is the most undervalued and 0 is the most overvalued company in the universe.
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
The Real "Bottom Rung"
Recently, Moody’s released a list of what they call “Bottom Rung Companies” which is based on the company’s ability, or lack thereof, to pay back the debt it owes. The 283 companies on the list roughly represent the riskiest 15% of all firms that Moody’s tracks. Moody’s does not always designate the most appropriate ratings (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were rated AAA before defaulting), so we decided to take their list into our own hands and provide the true bottom rung companies.
With so much negative news going around and many companies declaring bankruptcy, it is no surprise that measures of a firm’s financial strength, such as the Altman Z-Score (likelihood of a company to go bankrupt in the next 2 years), have been re-gaining popularity in the current market environment. So to help with our analysis, we used the Z-Score metric to analyze the companies on Moody’s list, as well as The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) screening variables to determine how attractive these firm’s are from a valuation standpoint, and how each company’s forecasted profitability for their fiscal 2009 year looks (Forecasted Economic Margin). As a result, ValueExpectations.com has put together a list of the 17 “riskiest” companies to avoid. Each of these companies have “at risk” level Z-Scores, unattractive valuations, and are forecasted to achieve negative profitability (EM) for their 2009 fiscal year, all of which indicate that they will be more likely to underperform.
Below the table is a short description of the Altman Z-score and a breakdown of what the scores mean, along with a brief description of what Economic Margin (EM) is and how it is calculated.
17 Companies At Risk of Bankruptcy
The Altman Z-score defined: A metric that gives insights into the likelihood of a firm going bankrupt in the next 2 years. The model was developed by Professor Edward I. Altman of the NYU’s Stern School of Business and first published in The Journal of FINANCE in September 1968.
The Altman Z-Score breaks down firms into 3 zones:
• >2.99 – Not Likely to go Bankrupt
• 1.8 - 2.99 – Gray Area
• <1.8 – Likely to go Bankrupt in the Next 2 Years
Economic Margin (EM) Defined: A measure of corporate performance that captures off balance sheet items, by looking at how much a company is earning above or below their cost of capital. EM is expressed in a % or margin. The Economic Margin Framework™ is more than just a performance metric as it encompasses a valuation system that explicitly addresses the four main drivers of enterprise value: profitability, competition, growth and cost of capital. more EM details (PDF)
Economic Margin Calculation:
Related Article: EPS Increased.....Company Underperformed?
Related: Read our Economic Margin white paper which was published in the book: Value-Based Metrics: Foundations and Practice Edited by: Frank J. Fabozzi and James L. Grant Pages 157 – 178: Click Here
- Value Expectations's blog
- Login or register to post comments
The Election Effect
The timing and performance of the stock market had an important impact on the outcome of the election just as the outcome of the election has had an impact on these 20 stocks since the election-day.
Listed are 10 of the best and worst performing stocks in the S&P 500 (excluding financials) since the November 4th election and their 5 year implied sales growth that the company needs to earn to be fairly valued at the closing price on 12/1/08.
*LIZ has since been removed from the S&P 500
Biggest Winners Since The Election
Biggest Losers Since The Election
Recently we also screened the S&P 500 to identify investment opportunities and identified over 150 companies (industrials) that have negative sales growth expectations embedded into their current market valuations. These companies include high quality companies such as: COH, DOW, CAH, TGT, JNJ, UTX, SBUX, and WAG, among others. If you would like to Read our study Click Here
Stay Connected With Value Expectations
.jpg)