CAT

It is very important to understand a company’s management strategy and management’s ability to create wealth for its shareholders. By using The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) Management Quality score investors have the ability to grade management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions and eliminate wealth destroying firms from your list of constituents. AFG’s Management Quality variable is used as an exclusionary variable to get rid of companies which continue to grow their businesses when they are not profitable (generating negative Economic Margin or negative EM, which is AFG’s way of understanding a firm’s economic profitability). When business units are unproductive and destroying wealth, management teams should not be looking to grow that business unit and concentrate on the parts of their company that have been creating wealth. Instead, the corporation needs to fix the broken parts of its business first by divesting losers and work on improving profitability to earn the right to expand. The best strategy AFG or any investor likes to see is a very profitable business (generating positive EMs) that grows its assets to maximize its profitability.

The companies listed below have been following a wealth destroying strategy and also look unattractive according to AFG’s valuation model and other key criteria AFG evaluates when considering the attractiveness of potential investment opportunities. These companies should be looked at with caution when considering these companies as additions to your clients portfolio as they contain many of the characteristics that AFG has proven to cause a company to be more likely to underperform the market and its sector peers.

Click Here to register for ValueExpectations to recieve more long/short ideas, Market Forecast Project results, and our Monthly Market Reviews... Its Fast and Free!!

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Management Quality – Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.

To stay updated on how other professional investor's currently view the market join our Market Forecast Project survey and be among the first to receive the results.

It is very important to understand a company’s management strategy and management’s ability to create wealth for its shareholders. By using The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) Management Quality score you have the ability to grade management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions and eliminate wealth destroying firms from your list of constituents. AFG’s Management Quality variable is used as an exclusionary variable to get rid of companies which continue to grow their businesses when they are not even profitable (generating negative Economic Margin or negative EM, which is AFG’s way of understanding a firm’s economic profitability). When business units are unproductive and destroying wealth, management teams should not be looking to grow that business unit and concentrate on the parts of their company that have been creating wealth. Instead, the corporation needs to fix the broken parts of its business first by divesting losers and work on improving profitability to earn the right to expand. The best strategy AFG or any investor likes to see is a very profitable business (generating positive EMs) that grows its assets to maximize its profitability.

The companies listed below (which include CAT & AMAT) have been following a wealth destroying strategy by growing their assets as their EMs have been declining which is reflected in their stock prices as none of these companies have been able to create any value for their shareholders over the last year. Along with managements inability to create shareholder wealth, these firms also look unattractive according to AFG’s valuation model and other key criteria AFG evaluates when considering the attractiveness of potential investment opportunities. These companies must stop growing their assets or divest some losers and focus on improving their EM’s before these firms will begin to see sustainable improvements in their stocks price and begin to add wealth to their shareholders. The expected change in the level of a company’s EMs has proven through back-tests to be highly correlated with the subsequent performance of its stock price. The 2 company examples below show the levels of each companies EMs through time as well as their asset growth. CAT and AMAT have continued to grow their assets as their EMs have declined and that strategy is reflected in their falling stock prices.

Management Competence Factors

• Have there been any changes in the executive management team?

• Has the company had any significant write-offs or poor earnings quality?

• Has the company recently made any significant acquisitions and, if so, what are the strategic implications and costs?

• How is the company spending any excess cash?

• What did we learn from the company’s most recent earnings call and what was the tone of analyst questions?

Management Quality Score Insights:

• Measures a company’s EM+1 and LFY Asset Growth.

• Companies that have positive EMs should grow their business while firms with negative EMs should focus on profitability and earn the right to grow.

• Un-bias quantitative way to analyze a company

• Holds management teams accountable for unprofitable growth

Below are examples of AFG's Wealth Creation Reports of CAT & AMAT that show deteriorating EMs while continuing to grow their assets and the subsequent poor performance over the past 1 year.

Other Popular Articles: 

Understanding the true intrinsic value of a company is very important when attempting to identify and take advantage of mispriced securities. The Applied Finance Group (AFG) has proven to be successful at helping their clients find attractive investment opportunities and also help avoid potential torpedo stocks by utilizing their Economic Margin Framework. AFG’s Economic Margin (EM) is the measure of the true economic profitability a company is earning after several adjustments to eliminate distortions caused by traditional accounting practices. Understanding a company’s EM levels and expected changes in EMs is important as it has been proven through vigorous back-tests that a company’s expected change in EMs is highly correlated with the company’s future market performance. Companies expected to improve their EM’s have proven to be more likely to outperform than those companies with declining EMs.

Source (The Applied Finance Group)

Fortune magazine recently put out an article listing the most admired companies in the world.  We took the top 50 firms (excluding Financials, and companies not traded in the US) on their list and put them through Applied Finance Group's quantitative recommendation framework.  Just because these firms are among the most admired companies in the world does not qualify them as the most attractive investment. Being among the most admired is an honor and means you must be doing something right, but might not necessarily mean the share price is currently attractive. 

The following articles which we have posted in the past on ValueExpectations.com will give you a better understanding of what it takes for management to create wealth, understand Management Quality, and see how EPS alone falls short in estimating a company’s value. There are two main characteristics a company must have in order to be a good investment opportunity: (1) the company needs to be a strong economic performer, (2) the company should be attractively priced.   Many people admired the DeLorean, but it was neither a good performing car nor a good priced car. Below we reveal a few "DeLoreans" after looking under the hood.

Top 50 Most Admired Companies According to Fortune

ValueExpectations.com recently posted, “Dividends are falling, so stocks have less value?” which gave some insight on our thoughts on the effect dividends have on stock values. We concluded that dividends alone are irrelevant in estimating a company’s value.

As a follow up to that article we have identified a dozen companies that pay a dividend and have the fundamentals to support the dividend. We looked at several fundamental factors to flush out companies that may be at risk of reducing their dividend in the near future. The end result, was a list of companies with:

-Positive Future Economic Margins
-Low Financial Debt
-High Management Quality
-High Valuation Score
-High Dividend Yield

Solid Companies That Pay A Dividend:

*AFG’s Value Expectation interface allows us to understand the imbedded Sales Growth, EBITDA Margins, and Asset Turnovers a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The above table displays the implied future sales growth of these mining companies assuming their EBITDA margins and Asset turnovers stay at the 5 year median levels.

Register with Value Expectations to Access Exclusive Market Reviews and Special Studies:

As a new administration takes office, investors will be looking for companies that will benefit most from Obama taking office. Which stocks will your “Obama Portfolio” consist of? Will you load up on infrastructure, health-care, alternative-energy, or green companies? If Obama’s big plans are carried out, these are a few areas that may see a direct benefit. Karim Bardeesy from The Big Money put together a list of stocks they feel will benefit from the new administration and are comparing their “Obama Portfolio” to one created by Jim Cramer. Here we will look at both portfolios and compare their sales growth expectations to see which of these firms will be more likely to out-perform. We will re-visit at a later date to see which “Obama Portfolio” will have provided the better return.

 The Big Money's "Obama Portfolio" and Each Company's Sales Expectations

*denotes less than 5 years historical sales numbers, ** = 2 years *** = 3 years

Jim Cramer's "Obama Portfolio" and Each Company's Sales Expectations

VE Sales Growth calculated for these companies on 1-21-09