ANF

A list of the 25 top performing stocks of 2010 (ex. Financials) from within the S&P 500 index. We have taken the top 25 companies from 2010 and provided our readers 3 attractive and 5 unattractive stocks from this list based on their valuation attractiveness relative to sector peers and overall investment opportunity using key criteria that The Applied Finance Group (AFG) uses in its stock selection process including corporate performance, management quality and earnings quality to see which of the top performers still look to have upside and which look like they have run out of room to run.

A focus list of buys and sells for our readers to use as a starting point when looking to make changes to portfolio. This list contains attractive and unattractive stocks from every major sector excluding financials. AFG's buy and sell lists have proven through time to provide a significant spread between the buys and sells helping you to identify winners and avoid potential torpedoes.

It is very important to understand a company’s management strategy and management’s ability to create wealth for its shareholders. By using The Applied Finance Group’s (AFG’s) Management Quality score investors have the ability to grade management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions and eliminate wealth destroying firms from your list of constituents. AFG’s Management Quality variable is used as an exclusionary variable to get rid of companies which continue to grow their businesses when they are not profitable (generating negative Economic Margin or negative EM, which is AFG’s way of understanding a firm’s economic profitability). When business units are unproductive and destroying wealth, management teams should not be looking to grow that business unit and concentrate on the parts of their company that have been creating wealth. Instead, the corporation needs to fix the broken parts of its business first by divesting losers and work on improving profitability to earn the right to expand. The best strategy AFG or any investor likes to see is a very profitable business (generating positive EMs) that grows its assets to maximize its profitability.

The companies listed below have been following a wealth destroying strategy and also look unattractive according to AFG’s valuation model and other key criteria AFG evaluates when considering the attractiveness of potential investment opportunities. These companies should be looked at with caution when considering these companies as additions to your clients portfolio as they contain many of the characteristics that AFG has proven to cause a company to be more likely to underperform the market and its sector peers.

Investment   Management Ticker Name Sector  Opportunity Quality Score Unattractive S&P 500 Companies With Poor Management Quality Scores (NYSE:TXT) TEXTRON INC Capital Goods Unattractive Poor (NYSE:HOT)  STARWOOD HTLS & RSRTS WW Consumer Services Unattractive Poor (NYSE:IGT) INTERNAT GAME TECHNOLOGY Consumer Durable Unattractive Poor (NYSE:CAT)  CATERPILLAR INC Capital Goods Unattractive Poor (NYSE:TSN) TYSON FOODS INC Consumer Non Durable Unattractive Poor (NYSE:ANF)  ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO Consumer Services Unattractive Poor (NYSE:BJS)  BJ SERVICES CO Capital Goods Unattractive Poor (NYSE:JNPR)  JUNIPER NETWORKS INC Technology Unattractive Poor

Source: EconomicMargin.com

Click Here to register for ValueExpectations to recieve more long/short ideas, Market Forecast Project results, and our Monthly Market Reviews... Its Fast and Free!!

AFG's Valuation Metric – Measures the percent to target (deviation between a stock’s current trading price and its AFG current default target price). To derive the intrinsic value of a firm, AFG uses its proprietary Valuation Model (modified discounted cash flow model).

Economic Margin - A corporate performance measurement that addresses the gaps in GAAP, eliminating distortions caused by accounting policies to measure what a company is truly earning above or below their cost of capital.

Management Quality – Assesses management’s ability to make wealth creating decisions.

 

To stay updated on how other professional investor's currently view the market join our Market Forecast Project survey and be among the first to receive the results.

Faisal Laljee of stocksandblogs.com came out with 2 blogs earlier this year providing companies that he believed were the top stocks to own/watch for 2009 (Part 1, Part 2). Laljee was on the money with his predictions so far through 2009. 13 of the 15 companies he recommended have positive returns and the whole portfolio of 15 companies has an average return of 21.24% compared to the S&P 500 return of 0.10% over the same time period. Valueexpectations.com thought it would be useful to analyze how these firms are positioned as possible investment opportunities going forward from AFG’s valuation standpoint. Valuation Attractiveness is determined by AFG’s proprietary valuation framework, which estimates a stock’s intrinsic value through a DCF model which incorporates a corporation’s Economic Profitability, Growth of Capital Base, Decay, and Cost of Capital. In addition, we also showed sales growth expectations embedded in each company’s latest stock price and its historical 5 year median sales growth. It is interesting but not surprising that all the Attractive stocks have low implied sales growth compared to those companies’ historical performance.

 

Stocksandblogs.com 15 Companies To Own/Watch In 2009 : Perfomance Results

 

*AFG’s Value Expectations allows us to understand the Sales Growth, EBITDA Margin, and Asset Turnover a company has to deliver in the future to justify its current trading price. In theory and in normal circumstances, if the imbedded future performance is very conservative relative to the company’s historical performance, the stock is regarded as undervalued. The table displays the implied future Sales Growth of the list of companies assuming their EBITDA Margins and Asset Turnovers stay at the 5 year median levels.

In life, the most attractive people are in shape and have good looks, just look at Hollywood. The same is true the majority of the time in investing. The most attractive stocks have healthy financial statements and look good from a valuation standpoint.

The Altman Z-score is a metric that gives insights into the likelihood of a firm going bankrupt in the next 2 years. The model was developed by Professor Edward I. Altman of the NYU’s Stern School of Business and first published in The Journal of FINANCE in September 1968. A common critique to this metric is that it was developed over 40 years ago and is no longer relevant.

In 2001, Professor Joseph D. Piotroski of The University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, published a paper called, Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski showed that value investors were rewarded by looking at a firm’s financial health and he showed that Z-score was a meaningful statistic.
More recently, on December 5, 2008, Dr. Altman was called to testify before a House of Representatives Committee on the condition of U.S. Automakers. In his testimony, he noted that Bloomberg, Inc. reported, “that approximately 1,000 users of their system per day access the Altman Z-Score model.”

The Altman Z-Score breaks down firms into 3 zones:
• >2.99 – Not Likely to Go Bankrupt
• 1.8 - 2.99 – Gray Area
• <1.8 – Likely to Go Bankrupt in the Next 2 Years

Using AFGView.com, we screened for firms that looked relatively attractive from a valuation perspective and had an Altman Z-Score above 2.99. Below is a list of those firms. Later we will look at firms that are expensive and have a Z-Score below 1.8.

Sales Expectations for Companies with an Attractive Valuation and Healthy Balance Sheet